On 10/19/2012 07:24 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:25:47PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >> Move the check for populated_zone() to the control statement of the >> 'for' loop and get rid of the odd looking if/else block. >> >> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <[email protected]> >> --- >> >> include/linux/mmzone.h | 7 ++----- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h >> index 50aaca8..5bdf02e 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h >> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h >> @@ -913,11 +913,8 @@ extern struct zone *next_zone(struct zone *zone); >> >> #define for_each_populated_zone(zone) \ >> for (zone = (first_online_pgdat())->node_zones; \ >> - zone; \ >> - zone = next_zone(zone)) \ >> - if (!populated_zone(zone)) \ >> - ; /* do nothing */ \ >> - else >> + zone && populated_zone(zone); \ >> + zone = next_zone(zone)) > > I don't think we want to /abort/ the loop when encountering an > unpopulated zone. >
Oops! I totally missed that.. thanks for catching it! Please ignore the patch. Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
