On Monday 22 of October 2012 11:59:19 Bryan Wu wrote: > Hiya, > > Can I get some Acked or Tested-by from Rafael or Miles before I put it > in my linux-leds tree?
Well, I just explained why the current code didn't work. :-) Anyway, please feel free to add Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> to the patch (assuming that the performance impact is negligible). Thanks, Rafael > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Bryan Wu <coolo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Linus Walleij > > <linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Bryan Wu <coolo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Mutex lock is not safe in atomic context like the bug reported by > >>> Miles Lane: > >> (...) > >>> This patch replace mutex lock with spin lock which is safe for this case. > >>> > >>> Reported-by: Miles Lane <miles.l...@gmail.com> > >>> Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> > >>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> > >>> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <coolo...@gmail.com> > >> > >> Looks correct to me: > >> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> > >> > > > > Thanks, Linus. > > > > Miles, could you please help to try this patch on your testing system? > > I really appreciate it. > > > > -Bryan > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
