On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:18:38PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Sounds fairly valid to me. But, it's also one that would not be harmed
> or disrupted in any way because of a single additional printk() during
> each suspend-to-disk operation.
Btw,
back to the drop_caches patch. How about we hide the drop_caches
interface behind some mm debugging option in "Kernel Hacking"? Assuming
we don't need it otherwise on production kernels. Probably make it
depend on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM like CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_RB or so.
And then also add it to /proc/vmstat, in addition.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
