On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:07:41AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:17:43PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> > > > > ... which, analogous to DEVICE_INT_ATTR provides functionality to > > set/clear bools. Its purpose is to be used where values need to be used > > as booleans in configuration context. > > > > Next patch uses this. > > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> > > Do you want me to take this through my tree now? If not, I have no > objection to it being part of this larger series and go to Linus through > whatever tree takes it.
Well, in my case it would go through the RAS tree. And I, like you, don't care which way it goes except maybe that if those 5 patches stay together, there won't be any build issues due to merging order in linux-next and later Linus' tree if that first patch goes separately. But I'm absolutely open to whatever you suggest is best. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach GM: Alberto Bozzo Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
