On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:33AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:52:55PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> > This patch provides the aforementioned procfs file that lists
> > the default firmware paths that are used during firmware lookup.
> >
> > The file contains a white space separated list of paths.
>
> Paths can have whitespaces :(
>
> How about using the "universal" path seperator of ':' that shells are
> used to using? Yeah, it gets messy if you have a ':' in a path, but
> from what I can tell, only the openSUSE build system does looney things
> like that.
Sure I can do that, however, could you comment on Ming's comments? Is
this patchset something we find useful at the moment as regards listing
and/or updating the firmware path list.
> > There will be another patch on top of this that adds the functionality
> > to modify the paths at runtime.
>
> Did I miss that patch somewhere?
That patch is here:
http://opensource.wolfsonmicro.com/~dp/patches/firmware/0004-firmware-Add-write-support-to-proc-fw_path.patch
However I've not rebased that patch on top of linux-next and I did not
send it for review as it seems that it may be a more sensible solution
to pass this as a kernel parameter.
Let me know what you think and I'll squeeze some time this weekend
to look at this.
Thanks,
Dimitris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
