On 10/26/2012 03:34 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:31:54AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 02:30:47PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lior Amsalem <al...@marvell.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi
>>> index 94b4b9e..a911f7a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-xp.dtsi
>>> @@ -69,6 +69,15 @@
>>> compatible = "marvell,armada-addr-decoding-controller";
>>> reg = <0xd0020000 0x258>;
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + sata@d00a0000 {
>>> + compatible = "marvell,orion-sata";
>>> + reg = <0xd00a0000 0x2400>;
>>> + interrupts = <55>;
>>> + clocks = <&coreclk 0>;
>>
>> nit. whitespace?
>
> [Don't shoot the messenger]
>
> How about extending checkpatch to check for this? I guess its just
> spaces which should be tabs.
No it is the opposite in fact! On this line it's tabs: 3 tabs of 8
whitespace, so the line start at 24. But as there is a '+', the first
tab is only 7, so it is still start at 24. Whereas for the other lines
it's 24 white spaces, so with the '+' it starts at 25. That's why I
didn't notice it, and if you apply the patch all is fine.
Now, about white spaces vs tab, I don't know what is the rule for .dts
file.
Gregory
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
