On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:06:45PM +0000, Michal Simek wrote: [...] > I am not big fan to use dtsi solution because dts can be simple generated > directly > From Xilinx design tool based on your hw design. That's why I can't see any > benefit > To have dtsi file.
Can I ask you to reconsider? We, for example, don't make any use of the Xilinx dev tools to generate our device trees. Having a dtsi allows for easy extension of the zynq-7000 platform for our boards, without having to carry duplicate data. Is it going to be expected that users building kernels for their zynq targets have access to the Xilinx EDK? > > Would you like for me to pull this into v5, or spin up a separate patch > > series? > > Definitely not. I have checked patches but haven't got it work on the zc702. > Not sure if you have run it on real hw or just on the qemu as you have > mentioned > In 5/5. You're likely running into the issue Nick has identified in the thread for patch 5 where the chosen virtual address for the uart doesn't seem to work: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg203141.html We haven't yet identified the root cause; any insight you can provide here would be beneficial. Otherwise, I'm considering reworking patch 5 to move the uart mapping to a known working location. Thanks, Josh
pgpip1FXMWVUR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
