The block within sys_swapoff which re-inserts the swap_info into the
swap_list in case of failure of try_to_unuse() reads a few values outside
the swap_lock. While this is safe at that point, it is subtle code.

Simplify the code by moving the reading of these values to a separate
function, refactoring it a bit so they are read from within the
swap_lock. This is easier to understand, and matches better the way it
worked before I unified the insertion of the swap_info from both
sys_swapon and sys_swapoff.

This change should make no functional difference. The only real change
is moving the read of two or three structure fields to within the lock
(frontswap_map_get() is nothing more than a read of p->frontswap_map).

Signed-off-by: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[email protected]>
---
 mm/swapfile.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 71cd288..886db96 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -1443,13 +1443,12 @@ static int setup_swap_extents(struct swap_info_struct 
*sis, sector_t *span)
        return generic_swapfile_activate(sis, swap_file, span);
 }
 
-static void enable_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p, int prio,
+static void _enable_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p, int prio,
                                unsigned char *swap_map,
                                unsigned long *frontswap_map)
 {
        int i, prev;
 
-       spin_lock(&swap_lock);
        if (prio >= 0)
                p->prio = prio;
        else
@@ -1473,6 +1472,21 @@ static void enable_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p, 
int prio,
        else
                swap_info[prev]->next = p->type;
        frontswap_init(p->type);
+}
+
+static void enable_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p, int prio,
+                               unsigned char *swap_map,
+                               unsigned long *frontswap_map)
+{
+       spin_lock(&swap_lock);
+       _enable_swap_info(p, prio, swap_map, frontswap_map);
+       spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
+}
+
+static void reinsert_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p)
+{
+       spin_lock(&swap_lock);
+       _enable_swap_info(p, p->prio, p->swap_map, frontswap_map_get(p));
        spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
 }
 
@@ -1549,14 +1563,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, 
specialfile)
        compare_swap_oom_score_adj(OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX, oom_score_adj);
 
        if (err) {
-               /*
-                * reading p->prio and p->swap_map outside the lock is
-                * safe here because only sys_swapon and sys_swapoff
-                * change them, and there can be no other sys_swapon or
-                * sys_swapoff for this swap_info_struct at this point.
-                */
                /* re-insert swap space back into swap_list */
-               enable_swap_info(p, p->prio, p->swap_map, frontswap_map_get(p));
+               reinsert_swap_info(p);
                goto out_dput;
        }
 
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to