If we enqueue a work while in dyntick idle mode and the arch doesn't
have self-IPI support, we may not find an opportunity to run the work
before a while.

In this case, exit the idle loop to re-evaluate irq_work_needs_cpu()
and restart the tick.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
---
 kernel/irq_work.c |   11 +++++++++++
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
index ce72b20..b500271 100644
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@ -76,6 +76,17 @@ static void __irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
                 */
                if (!arch_irq_work_has_ipi() || tick_nohz_tick_stopped())
                        arch_irq_work_raise();
+
+               /*
+                * If we rely on the timer tick or some obscure way to run the 
work
+                * while the CPU is in dyntick idle mode, we may not have an 
opportunity
+                * to do so before a while. Let's just exit the idle loop and 
hope we
+                * haven't yet reached the last need_resched() check before the 
CPU goes
+                * to low power mode.
+                */
+               if (!arch_irq_work_has_ipi() && tick_nohz_tick_stopped()
+                   && is_idle_task(current))
+                       set_need_resched();
        }
 out:
        preempt_enable();
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to