Hi Benjamin,
> Win8 certification introduced the ability to transmit two X and two Y per
> touch. The specification precises that it must be in an array, with a
> report count == 2.
The number two never really enters the patch, so maybe it should be
dropped to avoid confusion. It probably makes more sense to comment on
in a later patch, when the reports are actually used.
>
> This test guarantees that we split the touches on the last element
> in this array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoi...@enac.fr>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> index 725d155..95562d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> @@ -577,12 +577,16 @@ static int mt_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct
> hid_field *field,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (usage->hid == td->last_slot_field)
> - mt_complete_slot(td, field->hidinput->input);
> -
> - if (field->index == td->last_field_index
> - && td->num_received >= td->num_expected)
> - mt_sync_frame(td, field->hidinput->input);
> + if (usage_index + 1 == field->report_count) {
> + /* we only take into account the last report
> + * of a field if report_count > 1 */
Seems we could drop "of a field if report_count > 1" here, and be even
more correct.
> + if (usage->hid == td->last_slot_field)
> + mt_complete_slot(td, field->hidinput->input);
> +
> + if (field->index == td->last_field_index
> + && td->num_received >= td->num_expected)
> + mt_sync_frame(td, field->hidinput->input);
> + }
>
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.11.7
Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
