On Sun, 04 Nov 2012, David Miller wrote: > From: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 23:02:30 +0100 > > > Instead of issuing (0) statements when !CONFIG_SYSFS which will cause > > 'warning: ', we'll use inline statements instead. This will effectively > > do the same thing, but suppress any unnecessary warnings. > > > > Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemmin...@vyatta.com> > > Cc: bri...@lists.linux-foundation.org > > Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > > Applied, but please use more informative subject lines. > > You should prefix your subject line after [PATCH ...] with > the name of the subsystem you are touching, a ": " then > the headline description. > > So here you would have used "bridge: " and that's what I added when I > commited this patch.
Yes, of course I should have done, and usually do. This was an oversight, sorry about that. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
