On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:43:36AM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > From: Xiao Jiang <[email protected]> > > Add related name for A5/A7/A15 which are consistent with the OProfile > user ABI. > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Jiang <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm/oprofile/common.c | 3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c b/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c > index 99c63d4b..ec10db1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c > +++ b/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c > @@ -37,8 +37,11 @@ static struct op_perf_name { > { "xscale1", "arm/xscale2" }, > { "v6", "arm/armv6" }, > { "v6mpcore", "arm/mpcore" }, > + { "ARMv7 Cortex-A5", "arm/armv7-ca5" }, > + { "ARMv7 Cortex-A7", "arm/armv7-ca7" }, > { "ARMv7 Cortex-A8", "arm/armv7" }, > { "ARMv7 Cortex-A9", "arm/armv7-ca9" }, > + { "ARMv7 Cortex-A15", "arm/armv7-ca15" }, > }; > > char *op_name_from_perf_id(void)
I'd rather not go down this route now that we have the operf tool as part of oprofile, which can use the perf syscall directly and doesn't need this string translation. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
