On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 15:23 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Just use BUG_ON() instead of constructions such as:
>
> if (...)
> BUG()
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation
> is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression e;
> @@
> - if (e) BUG();
> + BUG_ON(e);
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com>
I'm not sure that trivial changes like this are worth it, but equally,
they're not worth having a discussion about, so...
Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <t...@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
> index 1862d8f..0fb370d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
> @@ -1212,8 +1212,7 @@ static int register_test_probe(struct test_probe *probe)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (probe->registered)
> - BUG();
> + BUG_ON(probe->registered);
>
> ret = register_kprobe(&probe->kprobe);
> if (ret >= 0) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
