On 11/07/2012 12:11 AM, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> No functional changes. Just a cleanup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza....@gmail.com>

Looks good to me:

Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <l...@metafoo.de>

One minor comment though:

> ---
>  drivers/power/jz4740-battery.c |   33 +++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/power/jz4740-battery.c b/drivers/power/jz4740-battery.c
> index 59900c6..e4ec7eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/jz4740-battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/jz4740-battery.c
>[...]
> -     jz_battery->base = ioremap_nocache(jz_battery->mem->start,
> -                             resource_size(jz_battery->mem));
> +     jz_battery->base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, mem);
>       if (!jz_battery->base) {
> -             ret = -EBUSY;
> -             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to ioremap mmio memory\n");
> -             goto err_release_mem_region;
> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request/ioremap mmio memory\n");

devm_request_and_ioremap will print its own error messages if it fails, so
strictly speaking this is not necessary, but I don't think it is worth doing
resend just for this.

Anton, maybe you can just remove the line when applying the patch.

Thanks,
- Lars

> +             return -EBUSY;
>       }
>  
[...]

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to