* Mel Gorman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'd also like to add another, structural side note: you
> > mixed new vm-stats bits into the whole queue, needlessly
> > blowing up the size and the mm/ specific portions of the
> > tree. I'd suggest to post and keep those bits separately,
> > preferably on top of what we have already once it has
> > settled down. I'm keeping the 'perf bench numa' bits
> > separate as well.
>
> The stats part are fairly late in the queue. I noticed they
> break build for !CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA but it was trivially
> resolved. [...]
Ok - the vm-stats bits are the last larger item remaining that
I've seen - could you please redo any of your changes on top of
the latest tip:numa/core tree, to make them easier for me to
pick up?
Your tree is slowly becoming a rebase of tip:numa/core and that
will certainly cause problems.
I'll backmerge any delta patches and rebase as necessary - but
please do them as deltas on top of tip:numa/core to make things
reviewable and easier to merge:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git numa/core
Thanks!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
