On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > If you either show me some significant performance benefits or get me > an independent Tested-by, in both cases on a range of hardware (e.g., > x86 on the one hand and ARM or Power on the other), then I will queue it.
Just putting the code generated for x86 before and after side by side would be enough to convince you I think. > I wasn't prioritizing this one very high because it does not appear > to be on any sort of fastpath. If I am wrong about that, then you > have a good performance-benefit case, right? ;-) I do not think this needs to be a priority item. Just stick it in the tree somewhere to merge for the next merge period. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
