On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> Subject: x86/mm: Don't flush the TLB on #WP pmd fixups
> From: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> Date: Tue Nov 20 14:46:34 CET 2012
> 
> If we have a write protection #PF and fix up the pmd then the
> hugetlb code [the only user of pmdp_set_access_flags], in its
> do_huge_pmd_wp_page() page fault resolution function calls
> pmdp_set_access_flags() to mark the pmd permissive again,
> and flushes the TLB.
> 
> This TLB flush is unnecessary: a flush on #PF is guaranteed on
> most (all?) x86 CPUs, and even in the worst-case we'll generate
> a spurious fault.
> 
> So remove it.
> 

This patch did not cause the 2% speedup that you reported with THP 
enabled for me:

   numa/core at ec05a2311c35:           136918.34 SPECjbb2005 bops
   numa/core at 01aa90068b12:           128315.19 SPECjbb2005 bops (-6.3%)
   numa/core at 01aa90068b12 + patch:   128184.77 SPECjbb2005 bops (-6.4%)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to