* Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one
> > > > > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the
> > > > > latest
> > > > > schednuma figures I have available.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Report is linked here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/202
> > > >
> > > > I ended up cancelling the remaining tests and restarted with
> > > >
> > > > 1. schednuma + patches posted since so that works out as
> > >
> > > Mel, I'd like to ask you to refer to our tree as numa/core or
> > > 'numacore' in the future. Would such a courtesy to use the
> > > current name of our tree be possible?
> > >
> >
> > Sure, no problem.
>
> Thanks!
>
> I ran a quick test with your 'balancenuma v4' tree and while
> numa02 and numa01-THREAD-ALLOC performance is looking good,
> numa01 performance does not look very good:
>
> mainline numa/core balancenuma-v4
> numa01: 340.3 139.4 276 secs
>
> 97% slower than numa/core.
I mean numa/core was 97% faster. That transforms into
balancenuma-v4 being 50.5% slower.
Your numbers from yesterday showed an even bigger proportion:
AUTONUMA BENCH
3.7.0 3.7.0
3.7.0 3.7.0
3.7.0 3.7.0
rc6-stats-v4r12 rc6-schednuma-v16r2
rc6-autonuma-v28fastr3 rc6-moron-v4r38 rc6-twostage-v4r38
rc6-thpmigrate-v4r38
Elapsed NUMA01 1668.03 ( 0.00%) 486.04 ( 70.86%)
794.10 ( 52.39%) 601.19 ( 63.96%) 1575.52 ( 5.55%) 1066.67 (
36.05%)
In your test numa/core was 240% times faster than mainline, 63%
faster than autonuma and 119% faster than
balancenuma-"rc6-thpmigrate-v4r38".
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
