Hi Ezequiel,

On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:13:29 -0300 Ezequiel Garcia <elezegar...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
>  /**
> - * ubi_thread - UBI background thread.
> + * ubi_wl_do_work - UBI background wl worker function.
>   * @u: the UBI device description object pointer
>   */
> -int ubi_thread(void *u)
> +void ubi_wl_do_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> +     int err;
>       int failures = 0;
> -     struct ubi_device *ubi = u;
> -
> -     ubi_msg("background thread \"%s\" started, PID %d",
> -             ubi->bgt_name, task_pid_nr(current));
> -
> -     set_freezable();
> -     for (;;) {
> -             int err;
> -
> -             if (kthread_should_stop())
> -                     break;
> +     struct ubi_device *ubi = container_of(work, struct ubi_device, work);
>  
> -             if (try_to_freeze())
> -                     continue;
> -
> -             spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
> -             if (list_empty(&ubi->works) || ubi->ro_mode ||

Originally, 'ubi_thread' did nothing if 'ubi->ro_mode'.
This filtering is missing from 'ubi_wl_do_work' implementation.
How do we guarantee 'ubi_wl_do_work' is never queued when in RO mode?

> -                 !ubi->thread_enabled || ubi_dbg_is_bgt_disabled(ubi)) {
> -                     set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> -                     spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);
> -                     schedule();
> -                     continue;
> -             }
> -             spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);
> +     err = do_work(ubi);
> +     if (!err)
> +             return;
>  
> -             err = do_work(ubi);
> -             if (err) {
> -                     ubi_err("%s: work failed with error code %d",
> -                             ubi->bgt_name, err);
> -                     if (failures++ > WL_MAX_FAILURES) {
> -                             /*
> -                              * Too many failures, disable the thread and
> -                              * switch to read-only mode.
> -                              */
> -                             ubi_msg("%s: %d consecutive failures",
> -                                     ubi->bgt_name, WL_MAX_FAILURES);
> -                             ubi_ro_mode(ubi);
> -                             ubi->thread_enabled = 0;
> -                             continue;
> -                     }
> -             } else
> -                     failures = 0;
> -
> -             cond_resched();
> +     ubi_err("%s: work failed with error code %d",
> +             ubi->wq_name, err);
> +     if (failures++ > WL_MAX_FAILURES) {
> +             /*
> +              * Too many failures, disable the workqueue and
> +              * switch to read-only mode.
> +              */

This condition will never be met (after your change), since 'failures'
is local to 'ubi_wl_do_work' (per work invocation).

Formerly, 'failures' was local to 'ubi_thread' (per ubi device's
thread), hence it was possible that several 'do_works()' calls have
failed during thread's lifetime, reaching the WL_MAX_FAILURES limit.

If we'd like to preseve the 'failures' semantics, 'failures' should be
an 'ubi_device' property.

One last thing:
Some variables and functions (debug and sysfs) are still named *bgt*,
which is confusing.

Regards,
Shmulik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to