Hi Jianguo,

2012/11/30 11:47, Jianguo Wu wrote:
Hi Congyang,

Thanks for your review and comments.

On 2012/11/30 9:45, Wen Congyang wrote:

At 11/28/2012 05:40 PM, Jianguo Wu Wrote:
Hi Congyang,

I think vmemmap's pgtable pages should be freed after all entries are cleared, 
I have a patch to do this.
The code logic is the same as [Patch v4 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page 
table of x86_64 architecture.

How do you think about this?

Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu <wujian...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang....@huawei.com>
---
  include/linux/mm.h  |    1 +
  mm/sparse-vmemmap.c |  214 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  mm/sparse.c         |    5 +-
  3 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 5657670..1f26af5 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1642,6 +1642,7 @@ int vmemmap_populate(struct page *start_page, unsigned 
long pages, int node);
  void vmemmap_populate_print_last(void);
  void register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr, struct page *map,
                                  unsigned long size);
+void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages);

  enum mf_flags {
        MF_COUNT_INCREASED = 1 << 0,
diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
index 1b7e22a..242cb28 100644
--- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
+++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@
  #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
  #include <asm/pgtable.h>

+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
+#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
+#endif
+
  /*
   * Allocate a block of memory to be used to back the virtual memory map
   * or to back the page tables that are used to create the mapping.
@@ -224,3 +228,213 @@ void __init sparse_mem_maps_populate_node(struct page 
**map_map,
                vmemmap_buf_end = NULL;
        }
  }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
+static void vmemmap_free_pages(struct page *page, int order)
+{
+       struct zone *zone;
+       unsigned long magic;
+
+       magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
+       if (magic == SECTION_INFO || magic == MIX_SECTION_INFO) {
+               put_page_bootmem(page);
+
+               zone = page_zone(page);
+               zone_span_writelock(zone);
+               zone->present_pages++;
+               zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
+               totalram_pages++;
+       } else {
+               if (is_vmalloc_addr(page_address(page)))
+                       vfree(page_address(page));

Hmm, vmemmap doesn't use vmalloc() to allocate memory.


yes, this can be removed.

+               else
+                       free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(page), order);
+       }
+}
+
+static void free_pte_table(pmd_t *pmd)
+{
+       pte_t *pte, *pte_start;
+       int i;
+
+       pte_start = (pte_t *)pmd_page_vaddr(*pmd);
+       for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) {
+               pte = pte_start + i;
+               if (pte_val(*pte))
+                       return;
+       }
+
+       /* free a pte talbe */
+       vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd), 0);
+       spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+       pmd_clear(pmd);
+       spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+}
+
+static void free_pmd_table(pud_t *pud)
+{
+       pmd_t *pmd, *pmd_start;
+       int i;
+
+       pmd_start = (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud);
+       for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PMD; i++) {
+               pmd = pmd_start + i;
+               if (pmd_val(*pmd))
+                       return;
+       }
+
+       /* free a pmd talbe */
+       vmemmap_free_pages(pud_page(*pud), 0);
+       spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+       pud_clear(pud);
+       spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+}
+
+static void free_pud_table(pgd_t *pgd)
+{
+       pud_t *pud, *pud_start;
+       int i;
+
+       pud_start = (pud_t *)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd);
+       for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PUD; i++) {
+               pud = pud_start + i;
+               if (pud_val(*pud))
+                       return;
+       }
+
+       /* free a pud table */
+       vmemmap_free_pages(pgd_page(*pgd), 0);
+       spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+       pgd_clear(pgd);
+       spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+}
+
+static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address, pte_t *pbase)
+{
+       struct page *page = pmd_page(*(pmd_t *)kpte);
+       int i = 0;
+       unsigned long magic;
+       unsigned long section_nr;
+
+       __split_large_page(kpte, address, pbase);
+       __flush_tlb_all();
+
+       magic = (unsigned long) page->lru.next;
+       if (magic == SECTION_INFO) {
+               section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(page_to_pfn(page));
+               while (i < PTRS_PER_PMD) {
+                       page++;
+                       i++;
+                       get_page_bootmem(section_nr, page, SECTION_INFO);
+               }
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static void vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long 
end)
+{
+       pte_t *pte;
+       unsigned long next;
+
+       pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
+       for (; addr < end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
+               next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE) & PAGE_MASK;
+               if (next > end)
+                       next = end;
+
+               if (pte_none(*pte))
+                       continue;
+               if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PAGE_SIZE) &&
+                   IS_ALIGNED(end, PAGE_SIZE)) {
+                       vmemmap_free_pages(pte_page(*pte), 0);
+                       spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+                       pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
+                       spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);

If addr or end is not alianed with PAGE_SIZE, you may leak some
memory.


yes, I think we can handle this situation with the method you mentioned in the 
change log:
1. When removing memory, the page structs of the revmoved memory are filled
    with 0xFD.
2. All page structs are filled with 0xFD on PT/PMD, PT/PMD can be cleared.
    In this case, the page used as PT/PMD can be freed.

By the way, why is 0xFD?

There is no reason. I just filled the page with unique number.

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu


+               }
+       }
+
+       free_pte_table(pmd);
+       __flush_tlb_all();
+}
+
+static void vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long 
end)
+{
+       unsigned long next;
+       pmd_t *pmd;
+
+       pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
+       for (; addr < end; addr = next, pmd++) {
+               next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
+               if (pmd_none(*pmd))
+                       continue;
+
+               if (cpu_has_pse) {
+                       unsigned long pte_base;
+
+                       if (IS_ALIGNED(addr, PMD_SIZE) &&
+                           IS_ALIGNED(next, PMD_SIZE)) {
+                               vmemmap_free_pages(pmd_page(*pmd),
+                                                  get_order(PMD_SIZE));
+                               spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+                               pmd_clear(pmd);
+                               spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+                               continue;
+                       }
+
+                       /*
+                        * We use 2M page, but we need to remove part of them,
+                        * so split 2M page to 4K page.
+                        */
+                       pte_base = get_zeroed_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOTRACK);

get_zeored_page() may fail. You should handle this error.


That means system is out of memory, I will trigger a bug_on.

+                       split_large_page((pte_t *)pmd, addr, (pte_t *)pte_base);
+                       __flush_tlb_all();
+
+                       spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+                       pmd_populate_kernel(&init_mm, pmd, (pte_t *)pte_base);
+                       spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
+               }
+
+               vmemmap_pte_remove(pmd, addr, next);
+       }
+
+       free_pmd_table(pud);
+       __flush_tlb_all();
+}
+
+static void vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long 
end)
+{
+       unsigned long next;
+       pud_t *pud;
+
+       pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
+       for (; addr < end; addr = next, pud++) {
+               next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
+               if (pud_none(*pud))
+                       continue;
+
+               vmemmap_pmd_remove(pud, addr, next);
+       }
+
+       free_pud_table(pgd);
+       __flush_tlb_all();
+}
+
+void vmemmap_free(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
+{
+       unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)memmap;
+       unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(memmap + nr_pages);
+       unsigned long next;
+
+       for (; addr < end; addr = next) {
+               pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
+
+               next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
+               if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
+                       continue;
+
+               vmemmap_pud_remove(pgd, addr, next);
+               sync_global_pgds(addr, next);

The parameter for sync_global_pgds() is [start, end], not
[start, end)


yes, thanks.

+       }
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
index fac95f2..3a16d68 100644
--- a/mm/sparse.c
+++ b/mm/sparse.c
@@ -613,12 +613,13 @@ static inline struct page 
*kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
        /* This will make the necessary allocations eventually. */
        return sparse_mem_map_populate(pnum, nid);
  }
-static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *memmap, unsigned long nr_pages)
+static void __kfree_section_memmap(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages)
Why do you change this line?


0k, it is no need to change.

  {
-       return; /* XXX: Not implemented yet */
+       vmemmap_free(page, nr_pages);
  }
  static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *page, unsigned long nr_pages)
  {
+       vmemmap_free(page, nr_pages);
  }
  #else
  static struct page *__kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long nr_pages)


.






--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to