On 12/03/2012 08:45 PM, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 08:39:35PM +0530, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
From: Suzuki K. Poulose <suz...@in.ibm.com>
Introduce routines for saving and restoring the context
befre/after the single step. No functional changes involved.
These will be extended later to save/restore more info about
the process once we replace the ptrace helpers.
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suz...@in.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
index bc77834..1a62353 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -52,6 +52,16 @@ int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
return 0;
}
+static void uprobe_save_context_sstep(struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
+{
+ autask->saved_trap_nr = current->thread.trap_nr;
+}
+
+static void uprobe_restore_context_sstep(struct arch_uprobe_task *autask)
+{
+ current->thread.trap_nr = autask->saved_trap_nr;
+}
Can't the two above be inline?
I had this discussion with Srikar and he was of the opinion that, we
should leave it as just static and let the compiler do the optimization.
Thanks
Suzuki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
