On 12/05/2012 03:47 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:24:28 +0530
> "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> From: Michael Wang <[email protected]>
>>
>> With stop_machine() gone from the CPU offline path, we can't depend on
>> preempt_disable() to prevent CPUs from going offline from under us.
>>
>> Use the get/put_online_cpus_stable_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going
>> offline, while invoking from atomic context.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>       */
>> -    this_cpu = get_cpu();
>> +    get_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
>> +    this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> 
> I wonder if get_online_cpus_stable_atomic() should return the local CPU
> ID.  Just as a little convenience thing.  Time will tell.
>

With the new version which doesn't use extra cpumasks, we won't have to
bother about this..
 
>>      /*
>>       * Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> @@ -380,15 +383,15 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
>>      nodemask = cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(cpu));
>>      for (cpu = cpumask_first_and(nodemask, mask); cpu < nr_cpu_ids;
>>           cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, nodemask, mask)) {
>> -            if (cpu_online(cpu))
>> +            if (cpu_online_stable(cpu))
>>                      goto call;
>>      }
>>  
>>      /* Any online will do: smp_call_function_single handles nr_cpu_ids. */
>> -    cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
>> +    cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask, cpu_online_stable_mask);
>>  call:
>>      ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
>> -    put_cpu();
>> +    put_online_cpus_stable_atomic();
>>      return ret;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_any);
> 
> So smp_call_function_any() has no synchronization against CPUs coming
> online.  Hence callers of smp_call_function_any() are responsible for
> ensuring that CPUs which are concurrently coming online will adopt the
> required state?
>

Yes.
 
> I guess that has always been the case...
> 

Right.

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to