On Wed 12-12-12 12:23:29, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 12-12-12 18:44:13, Xishi Qiu wrote:
[...]
> > Hi Michal,
> > 
> > __initcall functions will be called in
> > start_kernel()
> >     rest_init()  // -> slab is already
> >             kernel_init()
> >                     kernel_init_freeable()
> >                             do_basic_setup()
> >                                     do_initcalls()
> > 
> > and setup_hugepagesz() will be called in
> > start_kernel()
> >     parse_early_param()  // -> before mm_init() -> kmem_cache_init()
> > 
> > Is this right?
> 
> Yes this is right. I just noticed that kmem_cache_init_late is an __init
> function as well and didn't realize it is called directly. Sorry about
> the confusion.
> Anyway I still think it would be a better idea to move the call into the
> hugetlb_cgroup_create callback where it is more logical IMO but now that
> I'm looking at other controllers (blk and kmem.tcp) they all do this from
> init calls as well. So it doesn't make sense to have hugetlb behave
> differently.
> 
> So
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz>

Ohh, and this deserves to be backported to stable (since 3.6).
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to