3.5.7.2 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>

commit a7227a0faa117d0bc532aea546ae5ac5f89e8ed7 upstream.

dev_pm_qos_add_request() can return 0, 1, or a negative error code,
therefore the correct error test is "if (error < 0)." Checking just for
non-zero return code leads to erroneous setting of the req->dev pointer
to NULL, which then leads to a repeated call to
dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() in st1232_ts_irq_handler(). This in turn
leads to an Oops, when the I2C host adapter is unloaded and reloaded again
because of the inconsistent state of its QoS request list.

Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/base/power/qos.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
index fd849a2..b95ebf2 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ int dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(struct device *dev,
        if (ancestor)
                error = dev_pm_qos_add_request(ancestor, req, value);
 
-       if (error)
+       if (error < 0)
                req->dev = NULL;
 
        return error;
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to