On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:16 PM, John Stultz <johns...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > On 12/13/2012 10:17 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> John, any feedback on this? >> > Sorry, yea, I've been meaning to get back to this. > > I'm still on the fence about just making getnstimeofday() safe for when > timekeeping is suspended, but at the same time, your issue needs fixing. > Also bailing out at the end still seems off to me. Even if someone is using > the values despite the WARN_ON, they really are getting junk values, and for > all the time that WARN_ON has been there, you're the first to report running > into it. > > Even so, I think I'm ok with this patch for now, but I suspect we may want > to rework it later. > > Looking at my inbox, I actually can't find a copy of this specific patch. Do > you mind bouncing it to me, so I have something I can apply? > > Should this also get marked for -stable?
Nah, I don't think it's worth it. Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/