Tejun Heo wrote: > > There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending > before queueing, flushing or cancelling it. Most uses are unnecessary > and quite a few of them are buggy. > > Remove unnecessary pending tests from exynos_dp_core. Only compile > tested. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com> > --- > Please let me know how this patch should be routed. I can take it > through the workqueue tree if necessary. > Cc'ed Jingoo and Florian. Now the exynos dp driver are being handled by Jingoo so let's waiting for his opinion to take this by himself or not. - Kukjin Kim > Thanks. > > drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > index 28fd686..3002a6a 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > +++ b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > @@ -1121,8 +1121,7 @@ static int __devexit exynos_dp_remove(struct > platform_device *pdev) > > disable_irq(dp->irq); > > - if (work_pending(&dp->hotplug_work)) > - flush_work(&dp->hotplug_work); > + flush_work(&dp->hotplug_work); > > if (pdev->dev.of_node) { > if (dp->phy_addr) > @@ -1144,8 +1143,7 @@ static int exynos_dp_suspend(struct device *dev) > struct exynos_dp_platdata *pdata = dev->platform_data; > struct exynos_dp_device *dp = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > - if (work_pending(&dp->hotplug_work)) > - flush_work(&dp->hotplug_work); > + flush_work(&dp->hotplug_work); > > if (dev->of_node) { > if (dp->phy_addr) > -- > 1.8.0.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/