On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 13:42 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> With 3.8-rc1, the first call of pci_map_single() that is not checked
> with a corresponding pci_dma_mapping_error() call results in a warning
> with a splat as follows:
>
> WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:933 check_unmap+0x480/0x950()
> Hardware name: HP Pavilion dv2700 Notebook PC
> forcedeth 0000:00:0a.0: DMA-API: device driver failed to check
> map error[device address=0x00000000b176e002] [size=90 bytes] [mapped as
> single]
>
> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c
> index 653487d..de39cf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c
> @@ -1821,6 +1821,11 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx(struct net_device *dev)
> skb->data,
> skb_tailroom(skb),
>
> PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + if (pci_dma_mapping_error(np->pci_dev,
> + np->put_rx_ctx->dma)) {
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
skb has no destructor yet, kfree_skb(skb) should be fine
> + goto packet_dropped;
> + }
> np->put_rx_ctx->dma_len = skb_tailroom(skb);
> np->put_rx.orig->buf = cpu_to_le32(np->put_rx_ctx->dma);
> wmb();
> @@ -1830,6 +1835,7 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx(struct net_device *dev)
> if (unlikely(np->put_rx_ctx++ == np->last_rx_ctx))
> np->put_rx_ctx = np->first_rx_ctx;
> } else {
> +packet_dropped:
> u64_stats_update_begin(&np->swstats_rx_syncp);
> np->stat_rx_dropped++;
> u64_stats_update_end(&np->swstats_rx_syncp);
> @@ -1856,6 +1862,11 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx_optimized(struct net_device
> *dev)
> skb->data,
> skb_tailroom(skb),
>
> PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + if (pci_dma_mapping_error(np->pci_dev,
> + np->put_rx_ctx->dma)) {
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> + goto packet_dropped;
> + }
> np->put_rx_ctx->dma_len = skb_tailroom(skb);
> np->put_rx.ex->bufhigh =
> cpu_to_le32(dma_high(np->put_rx_ctx->dma));
> np->put_rx.ex->buflow =
> cpu_to_le32(dma_low(np->put_rx_ctx->dma));
> @@ -1866,6 +1877,7 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx_optimized(struct net_device *dev)
> if (unlikely(np->put_rx_ctx++ == np->last_rx_ctx))
> np->put_rx_ctx = np->first_rx_ctx;
> } else {
> +packet_dropped:
> u64_stats_update_begin(&np->swstats_rx_syncp);
> np->stat_rx_dropped++;
> u64_stats_update_end(&np->swstats_rx_syncp);
> @@ -2217,6 +2229,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t nv_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct net_device *dev)
> bcnt = (size > NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE) ? NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE :
> size;
> np->put_tx_ctx->dma = pci_map_single(np->pci_dev, skb->data +
> offset, bcnt,
> PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + if (pci_dma_mapping_error(np->pci_dev,
> + np->put_tx_ctx->dma))
> + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
Really this is not going to work very well : caller will call this in a
loop.
> np->put_tx_ctx->dma_len = bcnt;
> np->put_tx_ctx->dma_single = 1;
> put_tx->buf = cpu_to_le32(np->put_tx_ctx->dma);
> @@ -2337,6 +2352,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t nv_start_xmit_optimized(struct
> sk_buff *skb,
> bcnt = (size > NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE) ? NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE :
> size;
> np->put_tx_ctx->dma = pci_map_single(np->pci_dev, skb->data +
> offset, bcnt,
> PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + if (pci_dma_mapping_error(np->pci_dev,
> + np->put_tx_ctx->dma))
> + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
same problem here.
> np->put_tx_ctx->dma_len = bcnt;
> np->put_tx_ctx->dma_single = 1;
> put_tx->bufhigh = cpu_to_le32(dma_high(np->put_tx_ctx->dma));
> @@ -5003,6 +5021,11 @@ static int nv_loopback_test(struct net_device *dev)
> test_dma_addr = pci_map_single(np->pci_dev, tx_skb->data,
> skb_tailroom(tx_skb),
> PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + if (pci_dma_mapping_error(np->pci_dev,
> + test_dma_addr)) {
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(tx_skb);
kfree_skb(skb);
> + goto out;
> + }
> pkt_data = skb_put(tx_skb, pkt_len);
> for (i = 0; i < pkt_len; i++)
> pkt_data[i] = (u8)(i & 0xff);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
