From: Lubomir Rintel <lkund...@v3.sk> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:17:43 +0100
> @@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static int txq_reclaim(struct tx_queue *txq, int budget, > int force) > struct netdev_queue *nq = netdev_get_tx_queue(mp->dev, txq->index); > int reclaimed; > > - __netif_tx_lock(nq, smp_processor_id()); > + __netif_tx_lock_bh(nq); I still don't understand why this change is necessary. The TX reclaim function is invoked in software interrupt context in all of the places where this lockdep warning might matter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
