3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 5e1f54201cb481f40a04bc47e1bc8c093a189e23 ]

Add logic to verify that a port comparison byte code operation
actually has the second inet_diag_bc_op from which we read the port
for such operations.

Previously the code blindly referenced op[1] without first checking
whether a second inet_diag_bc_op struct could fit there. So a
malicious user could make the kernel read 4 bytes beyond the end of
the bytecode array by claiming to have a whole port comparison byte
code (2 inet_diag_bc_op structs) when in fact the bytecode was not
long enough to hold both.

Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
@@ -548,6 +548,17 @@ static bool valid_hostcond(const struct
        return true;
 }
 
+/* Validate a port comparison operator. */
+static inline bool valid_port_comparison(const struct inet_diag_bc_op *op,
+                                        int len, int *min_len)
+{
+       /* Port comparisons put the port in a follow-on inet_diag_bc_op. */
+       *min_len += sizeof(struct inet_diag_bc_op);
+       if (len < *min_len)
+               return false;
+       return true;
+}
+
 static int inet_diag_bc_audit(const void *bytecode, int bytecode_len)
 {
        const void *bc = bytecode;
@@ -563,24 +574,30 @@ static int inet_diag_bc_audit(const void
                case INET_DIAG_BC_D_COND:
                        if (!valid_hostcond(bc, len, &min_len))
                                return -EINVAL;
-                       /* fall through */
-               case INET_DIAG_BC_AUTO:
+                       break;
                case INET_DIAG_BC_S_GE:
                case INET_DIAG_BC_S_LE:
                case INET_DIAG_BC_D_GE:
                case INET_DIAG_BC_D_LE:
-               case INET_DIAG_BC_JMP:
-                       if (op->no < min_len || op->no > len + 4 || op->no & 3)
-                               return -EINVAL;
-                       if (op->no < len &&
-                           !valid_cc(bytecode, bytecode_len, len - op->no))
+                       if (!valid_port_comparison(bc, len, &min_len))
                                return -EINVAL;
                        break;
+               case INET_DIAG_BC_AUTO:
+               case INET_DIAG_BC_JMP:
                case INET_DIAG_BC_NOP:
                        break;
                default:
                        return -EINVAL;
                }
+
+               if (op->code != INET_DIAG_BC_NOP) {
+                       if (op->no < min_len || op->no > len + 4 || op->no & 3)
+                               return -EINVAL;
+                       if (op->no < len &&
+                           !valid_cc(bytecode, bytecode_len, len - op->no))
+                               return -EINVAL;
+               }
+
                if (op->yes < min_len || op->yes > len + 4 || op->yes & 3)
                        return -EINVAL;
                bc  += op->yes;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to