On Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:44:37 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > As requested, i am resending all my cpufreq fixes together. I have added > correct > Tested-by flags.
I have dropped the previous versions and applied this series instead. There's no need to add a Tested-by for yourself if you sign-off a patch, though. Tested-by is information that somebody *in* *addition* to the original author has tested the patch, because we all should test the patches we sign-off, right? Rafael > Viresh Kumar (5): > cpufreq: Manage only online cpus > cpufreq: Notify governors when cpus are hot-[un]plugged > cpufreq: Don't use cpu removed during cpufreq_driver_unregister > cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev() > cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev() > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 316 > +++++++++++++++++----------------------- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 27 +++- > drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 9 ++ > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 14 +- > 4 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-) > > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
