On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:24:53AM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:17:26PM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > I thought this previously also [1], but I couldn't find any path such > > > > that a > > > > tick_cpu_device would have an evtdev without an event_handler. We > > > > always set the > > > > handler before setting evtdev, and alway wipe evtdev before wiping the > > > > handler. > > > > > > > > Have I missed something? > > > > > > That's an x86 specific issue. Though we could try and make that > > > functionality completely generic. > > > > Just to check: is the evt->event_handler check necessary? > > For x86 yes. See the comment.
Ah, sorry. I misunderstood on my initial reading. I've posted a version with the evt->event_handler check restored, and the tick_receive_broadcast stub removed when !CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/14/276 The generic clockevents patches (based on v3.8-rc3) can also be found at git://linux-arm.org/linux-mr.git tags/timer-broadcast-v3-core > Thanks, > > tglx > Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
