3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> commit fb719c59bdb4fca86ee1fd1f42ab3735ca12b6b2 upstream. Incrementing lenExtents even while writing to a hole is bad for performance as calls to udf_discard_prealloc and udf_truncate_tail_extent would not return from start if isize != lenExtents Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- fs/udf/inode.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/fs/udf/inode.c +++ b/fs/udf/inode.c @@ -574,6 +574,7 @@ static sector_t inode_getblk(struct inod struct udf_inode_info *iinfo = UDF_I(inode); int goal = 0, pgoal = iinfo->i_location.logicalBlockNum; int lastblock = 0; + bool isBeyondEOF; *err = 0; *new = 0; @@ -653,7 +654,7 @@ static sector_t inode_getblk(struct inod /* Are we beyond EOF? */ if (etype == -1) { int ret; - + isBeyondEOF = 1; if (count) { if (c) laarr[0] = laarr[1]; @@ -696,6 +697,7 @@ static sector_t inode_getblk(struct inod endnum = c + 1; lastblock = 1; } else { + isBeyondEOF = 0; endnum = startnum = ((count > 2) ? 2 : count); /* if the current extent is in position 0, @@ -743,7 +745,8 @@ static sector_t inode_getblk(struct inod *err = -ENOSPC; return 0; } - iinfo->i_lenExtents += inode->i_sb->s_blocksize; + if (isBeyondEOF) + iinfo->i_lenExtents += inode->i_sb->s_blocksize; } /* if the extent the requsted block is located in contains multiple -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
