Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not suggesting you modify ethtool for your needs :) But ethtool > perfectly illustrates the technique of using a single socket ioctl > (SIOCETHTOOL) to extend a set of standard, domain-specific ioctls > (ETHTOOL_xxx) to Linux networking drivers. I know. The problem is I don't see here any advantages over many SIOCxxx command codes, while there are disadvantages. Simple things are IMHO better, and ioctl was designed to handle many simple commands (instead of one complex). Am I missing something? -- Krzysztof Halasa Network Administrator - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Paul Fulghum
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Krzysztof Halasa
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Francois Romieu
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Krzysztof Halasa
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Paul Fulghum
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Ivan Passos
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Jeff Garzik
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Ivan Passos
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Krzysztof Halasa
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Jeff Garzik
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Krzysztof Halasa
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Jeff Garzik
- Re: RFC: configuring net interf... Krzysztof Halasa
- Re: RFC: configuring net interf... Francois Romieu
- Re: RFC: configuring net interf... Krzysztof Halasa
- Re: RFC: configuring net interf... Francois Romieu
- Re: RFC: configuring net interfaces Krzysztof Halasa