On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:
> +
> +static void ptrace_unfreeze_traced(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + if (task->state != __TASK_TRACED)
> + return;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!task->ptrace || task->parent != current))
> + return;
This WARN_ON() is bogus.
Because you added the warning, you then need to make the callers check
for the whole PTRACE_UNATTACH.
So I think you should just remove the WARN_ON(), and then just call
ptrace_unfreeze_traced() unconditionally after you've successfully
done a ptrace_check_attach(). Just to keep the code simpler.
Also, in your corrected version, you had
+ if (!wait_task_inactive(child, __TASK_TRACED)) {
+ /* This can only happen if may_ptrace_stop() fails */
+ WARN_ON(child->state == __TASK_TRACED);
+ ret = -ESRCH;
where I actually think that the comment is not really helpful. It
doesn't really explain what he child can do to get to ptrace_stop() in
the first place, and what that does to the child state...
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
