> Is there any special reason why any of those patches didn't make it to > the mainstream kernel code? All of them are worse for the normal case. Also 1500 running apache's isnt a remotely useful situation, you are thrashing the cache even if you are now not thrashing the scheduler. Use an httpd designed for that situation. Then you can also downgrade to a cheap pentium class box for the task ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Mike Kravetz
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Mike Kravetz
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Fabio Riccardi
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Mike Kravetz
- Re: a quest for a better sched... Fabio Riccardi
- Re: a quest for a better sched... Mike Kravetz
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better sched... Davide Libenzi
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Alan Cox
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Fabio Riccardi
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Alan Cox
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Fabio Riccardi
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Christopher Smith
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler alad
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Hubertus Franke
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Ingo Molnar
- Re: a quest for a better scheduler Andrea Arcangeli