>> FYI, I benchmarked a new version with :
>> CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME=y
>> CONFIG_PM=y
>>
>> but the performance loss is still present.
>
> In that case it is not quite likely that the commit you bisected to
> really introduced the problem, because it doesn't change things for
> CONFIG_PM=y.
>
> Does reverting that commit still help?

I tested several combinations. Results follows :
3.2.6 (base) + CONFIG_PM unset  => BAD
3.2.6 (base) + CONFIG_PM=y  => BAD
3.2.6 (base) + patch reverted + CONFIG_PM=y  => BAD
3.2.6 (base) + patch reverted + CONFIG_PM unset  => GOOD

So if I understand right, the targeted patch introduced the bug when
CONFIG_PM is unset, but there is an other bug when this var is set.
I'll try to track this commit.

Olivier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to