On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:46:59PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > reset_page_last_nid() is poorly named. page_reset_last_nid() would be > better, and consistent. >
Look at this closer, are you sure you want? Why is page_reset_last_nid() better or more consistent? The getter functions for page-related fields start with page (page_count, page_mapcount etc.) but the setters begin with set (set_page_section, set_page_zone, set_page_links etc.). For mapcount, we also have reset_page_mapcount() so to me reset_page_last_nid() is already consistent. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
