Some functions use ACPI_SUCCESS/FAILURE for checking return value of
acpi_bus_get_device().

Following patches change not to apply ACPI_SUCCESS/FAILURE to the
return value of acpi_bus_get_device().

[PATCH 1/4] ACPI/PM: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() check in drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
[PATCH 2/4] ACPI/dock: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() check in drivers/acpi/ddock.c
[PATCH 3/4] PNPACPI: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() check in 
drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
[PATCH 4/4] GPU/i915: Fix acpi_bus_get_device() check in 
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c

2013/01/31 7:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>

Since acpi_bus_get_device() returns int and not acpi_status, change
acpi_match_device() so that it doesn't apply ACPI_FAILURE() to the
return value of acpi_bus_get_device().

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/acpi/scan.c |    4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -491,9 +491,9 @@ const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_match_
                                               const struct device *dev)
  {
        struct acpi_device *adev;
+       acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);

-       if (!ids || !ACPI_HANDLE(dev)
-           || ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_bus_get_device(ACPI_HANDLE(dev), &adev)))
+       if (!ids || !handle || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
                return NULL;

        return __acpi_match_device(adev, ids);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to