In __next_wq_cpu() for_each_*wq_cpu(), the name WORK_CPU_LAST is proper than WORK_CPU_NONE, convert them to WORK_CPU_LAST.
WORK_CPU_NONE is not used any more, just remove it. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]> --- include/linux/workqueue.h | 3 +-- kernel/workqueue.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h index a94e4e8..2dcbacc 100644 --- a/include/linux/workqueue.h +++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h @@ -57,8 +57,7 @@ enum { /* special cpu IDs */ WORK_CPU_UNBOUND = NR_CPUS, - WORK_CPU_NONE = NR_CPUS + 1, - WORK_CPU_LAST = WORK_CPU_NONE, + WORK_CPU_LAST = NR_CPUS + 1, /* * Reserve 7 bits off of cwq pointer w/ debugobjects turned diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 577de10..973b290 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static inline int __next_wq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask, if (sw & 2) return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND; } - return WORK_CPU_NONE; + return WORK_CPU_LAST; } static inline int __next_cwq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask, @@ -282,17 +282,17 @@ static inline int __next_cwq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask, */ #define for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) \ for ((cpu) = __next_wq_cpu(-1, cpu_possible_mask, 3); \ - (cpu) < WORK_CPU_NONE; \ + (cpu) < WORK_CPU_LAST; \ (cpu) = __next_wq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, 3)) #define for_each_online_wq_cpu(cpu) \ for ((cpu) = __next_wq_cpu(-1, cpu_online_mask, 3); \ - (cpu) < WORK_CPU_NONE; \ + (cpu) < WORK_CPU_LAST; \ (cpu) = __next_wq_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask, 3)) #define for_each_cwq_cpu(cpu, wq) \ for ((cpu) = __next_cwq_cpu(-1, cpu_possible_mask, (wq)); \ - (cpu) < WORK_CPU_NONE; \ + (cpu) < WORK_CPU_LAST; \ (cpu) = __next_cwq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, (wq))) #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK -- 1.7.7.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
