* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>
>
> Rename EVENT_ATTR() to PMU_EVENT_ATTR() and make it global so it is
> available to all architectures.
>
> Further to allow architectures flexibility, have PMU_EVENT_ATTR() pass
> in the variable name as a parameter.
>
> Changelog[v2]
> - [Jiri Olsa] No need to define PMU_EVENT_PTR()
>
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> Cc: Robert Richter <[email protected]>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 13 +++----------
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
so this one started conflicting non-trivially with tip:perf/x86
- the pending memory profiling kernel-side bits.
Can we merge the memory profiling tooling side bits together
with the kernel side bits - or does it need more work?
For now I've excluded perf/x86 from tip:master until this is
resolved.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
