12.02.2013 00:58, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
<snip>
  void svc_close_net(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
  {
-       svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
-       svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
-
-       svc_clear_pools(serv, net);
-       /*
-        * At this point the sp_sockets lists will stay empty, since
-        * svc_xprt_enqueue will not add new entries without taking the
-        * sp_lock and checking XPT_BUSY.
-        */
-       svc_clear_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
-       svc_clear_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
+       int closed;
+       int delay = 0;
+
+again:
+       closed = svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
+       closed += svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
+       if (closed) {
+               svc_clean_up_xprts(serv, net);
+               msleep(delay++);
+               goto again;
+       }

Frankly, this hunk above makes me feel sick... :(
But I have no better idea right now...
Maybe make this hunk a bit less weird (this is from my POW only, of course), 
like this:

> +  while (svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net) +
> +         svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net)) {
> +          svc_clean_up_xprts(serv, net);
> +          msleep(delay++);
> +  }

?

Anyway, thanks!

Acked-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <[email protected]>

--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to