Tim Gardner <[email protected]> writes:

> befs_sb->num_blocks is of base type u64 which is the same as sector_t.
> Therefore, num_blocks can never be larger then the maximum
> value of sector_t.

The analysys is wrong.  On 32bit with CONFIG_LBAF unset sector_t is an
unsigned long aka a u32, while befs_off_t is always a u64.

Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>

> smatch analysis:
>
> fs/befs/linuxvfs.c:851 befs_fill_super() warn: impossible
>  condition '(befs_sb->num_blocks > ~(0)) => (0-u64max > u64max)'
>
> Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/befs/linuxvfs.c |    7 -------
>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c b/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> index 2b3bda8..2ce5705 100644
> --- a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> +++ b/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> @@ -848,13 +848,6 @@ befs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int 
> silent)
>       if (befs_check_sb(sb) != BEFS_OK)
>               goto unacquire_priv_sbp;
>  
> -     if( befs_sb->num_blocks > ~((sector_t)0) ) {
> -             befs_error(sb, "blocks count: %Lu "
> -                     "is larger than the host can use",
> -                     befs_sb->num_blocks);
> -             goto unacquire_priv_sbp;
> -     }
> -
>       /*
>        * set up enough so that it can read an inode
>        * Fill in kernel superblock fields from private sb
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to