The conditional declaration of ap_uart_data is broken
and causes this build error:

In file included from arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c:35:0:
arch/arm/mach-integrator/common.h:6:37: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
'__attribute__' before '{' token

Turning the check into an constant-expression if(IS_ENABLED()) statement
creates more readable code and solves this problem as well.

Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <li...@arm.linux.org.uk>
---
 arch/arm/mach-integrator/common.h | 5 -----
 arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/common.h 
b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/common.h
index 79197d8..72516658b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/common.h
@@ -1,10 +1,5 @@
 #include <linux/amba/serial.h>
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_INTEGRATOR_AP
 extern struct amba_pl010_data ap_uart_data;
-#else
-/* Not used without Integrator/AP support anyway */
-struct amba_pl010_data ap_uart_data {};
-#endif
 void integrator_init_early(void);
 int integrator_init(bool is_cp);
 void integrator_reserve(void);
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c
index 39c060f..81461d2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/core.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int __init integrator_init(bool is_cp)
         * hard-code them. The Integator/CP and forward have proper cell IDs.
         * Else we leave them undefined to the bus driver can autoprobe them.
         */
-       if (!is_cp) {
+       if (!is_cp && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_INTEGRATOR_AP)) {
                rtc_device.periphid     = 0x00041030;
                uart0_device.periphid   = 0x00041010;
                uart1_device.periphid   = 0x00041010;
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to