On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:14:13AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > HI Tejun, > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:11:25 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > This is very different from what has been in linux-next (it looks like > > you have been cherry-picking fixes from other sources into your for-next > > branch?): > > Or maybe what is in linux-next is a mash up of several different things?
Ooh, wq/for-next was combination of wq/for-3.9, wq/for-3.9-cleanups and wq/for-3.9-async. I'm fairly sure all the commits are accounted for. Checking again just in case.... $ git rev-list --pretty --oneline tmp ^next-20130219 bd26f12 Merge branch 'for-3.9-async' into tmp 0f985c9 Merge branch 'for-3.9-cleanups' into tmp 1438ade5 workqueue: un-GPL function delayed_work_timer_fn() tmp is for-3.9 + for-3.9-async + for-3.9-cleanups, so yeah other than the last cherry-pick, everything seems to be in order. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
