On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:02:24AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 13:04 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On some hardware configurations we have got the request line with the > > offset. > > The patch introduces convert_slave_id() helper for that cases. The request > > line > > base is got from the platform device resources provided by the > > IORESOURCE_DMA > > type. > > Hi, Vinod. > > v3.8 is just out, and we have not got any proposal from anyone how to > make our approach better. So, I'm just wondering about current state. I was trying to go thru ACPI 5 and see a solution, i think we - use IORESOURCE_IO, but they have a specfic meaning - accpet this patch with IORESOURCE_DMA, but again this has specfic dma meaning too. Just becoz you are in slave-dma driver, doesn't justify use of IORESOURCE_DMA as well - use platform_data (somehow get this from CSRT into device parsing logic of ACPI where you create your platform device and add this in platform data
> Rafael, could you share your opinion about our case with CSRT and > request line base (perhaps you need to go through the entire thread)? Sure, do we have anything better than above? -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
