On 02/13/2013 12:17 AM, Pawel Wieczorkiewicz wrote:
> From: Pawel Wieczorkiewicz <[email protected]>
> 
> Index of atmel_ports[ATMEL_MAX_UART] should be smaller
> than ATMEL_MAX_UART.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pawel Wieczorkiewicz <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c 
> b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> index d4a7c24..3f7586a 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> @@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ static int atmel_serial_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>               ret = find_first_zero_bit(&atmel_ports_in_use,
>                               sizeof(atmel_ports_in_use));
>  
> -     if (ret > ATMEL_MAX_UART) {
> +     if (!(ret < ATMEL_MAX_UART)) {

Good catch, but the result looks weird. Could you just make it ">="?

And find_first_zero_bit + sizeof above is bogus too. The sizeof returns
4 on 32-bit (the driver is run on 32bit machines exlusively AFAICS). So
the highest possible ret in there is 5. Instead atmel_ports_in_use
should be declared using DECLARE_BITMAP(atmel_ports_in_use,
ATMEL_MAX_UART) and the second parameter here then ATMEL_MAX_UART.

Could you fix that too?

-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to