On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > (cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body) > > Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction. > Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as > kmem_cache_destroy_work_func for something specific to memcg? How > about something like memcg_destroy_cache_workfn? >
I will take a look. Thanks for the report for the reportee: I tested cgroup deletion quite extensively (quite important feature for me) so it is nice to have an uncaught case. About naming, I can change, no problem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
