于 2013年02月27日 17:46, Vladimir Kondratiev 写道:
> Perhaps, it would be good idea to fight the original problem.
> 

  if my another 'beautify code' patches are applied into next-* tree.
    (that means most of members think it is a good idea).
    I will process the original problems (when processing, also cc to you).

  :-)

> I mean, fix warnings where possible. Example: there are lots of
> "unused parameter" ones. Where it is false warning, add __maybe_unused
> attribute. Like this:
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index c566927..83e43b7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -163,8 +163,9 @@ extern int _cond_resched(void);
>  # define might_sleep() \
>         do { __might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0); might_resched(); } while 
> (0)
>  #else
> -  static inline void __might_sleep(const char *file, int line,
> -                                  int preempt_offset) { }
> +  static inline void __might_sleep(const char *file __maybe_unused,
> +                                  int line __maybe_unused,
> +                                  int preempt_offset __maybe_unused) { }
>  # define might_sleep() do { might_resched(); } while (0)
>  #endif
>  

  thank you for your demo, it is valuable to me.

  :-)


-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to