Re: loadavg question

Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:28:57 -0800 

Hi,

yes, that commit is in my kernel 3.7.9 kernel source, but not in 3.3.2.
Also, I have CONFIG_NO_HZ=n in my .config. I will retry with
CONFIG_NO_HZ=y with 3.7.9.

Thanks,
Zoltán Böszörményi

2013-02-28 15:05 keltezĂŠssel, Azat Khuzhin Ă­rta:


Hi,

Could you check do you have commit that mentioned here?
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1346108

Respectfully
Azat Khuzhin.
>From phone.

On Feb 28, 2013 4:40 PM, "Boszormenyi Zoltan" <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi,

    on an embedded PC (500MHz AMD Geode), we recently tried
    to upgrade the kernel. The original version was 2.6.27, the new
    ones were 3.3.x and 3.7.x. With the same userspace (a GTK based
    GUI constantly querying daemons handling different pieces of
    hardware over serial ports), we noticed that loadavg is different
    while the idle time (95-97%) is the same. On 2.6.27, the load was
    around 0.05-0.3 while on 3.3.x and 3.7.x, it quickly crawled up
    to around 5. Has the load calculation changed so dramatically
    after 2.6.27?

    Thanks in advance,
    ZoltĂĄn BĂśszĂśrmĂŠnyi

    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to