On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Michal Hocko wrote: > I have already asked about it in the original thread but didn't get any > answer. How can we get a soft lockup when all implementations of show_mem > call touch_nmi_watchdog? >
Feel free to do s/soft lockups/irqs being disabled for an extremely long time/. > I do agree with the change but the above justification seems misleading. > Can we just remove the information because it is costly and doesn't give > us anything relevant to debug allocation failures? > I believe I have already said yes, that all pertinent information is already there and I do not believe this additional information continuously spewed to the kernel log is helpful in debugging VM issues or understanding why the oom condition exists. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
